Hi everyone,

I see that the CS767 is the new razz in the flightsim world and am looking to purchase it, once I've upgraded my computer.

I wanted to see what everyone's opinions are on this bird and what advancements Captain Sim has made in their aircraft since the FS9 752. Some things I've noticed with the 752 are that the FMC gives some very low approach speeds, in most cases lower then the 737. That can't be right, it's bigger and heavier so I'd assume it comes in a bit faster. Fully loaded with all my my ZFW and info plugged in, the approaches can be as low as 115kts. Another thing is that I have my X52 programmed with key assignments to disengage my AT and AP without having to let go of the stick and for a few seconds not have control of the aircraft. But with the Captain Sim 757 I get half of the AP disconnect sound and then nothing happens.

What I am looking for here is not trouble shooting for the FS9 757. What I would like to hear is anyone's opinion who has migrated to Captain Sim's FSX line of aircraft from FS9 and can let me know how the modern passenger liners are stacking up. I run FSX now with 45fps with the another company Twin Otter but when I load the CS767 demo, the frames completely dive, we're talking about 28-35fps. How many more frames can I expect to loose with all of the screens up?

Not trying to plug any one else's product here, but want to know that the 767 is the aircraft for me and I'm not about to drop money on an FS slide show


Thanks to everyone that can help!

Cappy wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2012 at 8:40am:


Thanks for the reply Cappy,

What makes the Captain Sim 767 superior to the Captain Sim 757? What has Captain Sim done differently and better?