boeing247 wrote on Jul 28^th, 2011 at 8:19pm:

Yeah, there isn't much to say we should blame the aircraft in this case.

Once again, even if this may compliment the A380, we don't know that.
There so much interesting literature out there about investigations of all kinds and when listing the most common error sources, the 'assuming from thinking to know' is the very first one.

Psychologically it's a though part of work for experienced investigators to 'start new' on every given case by the way. Humans tend to assume from a knowledge basis in the first place, but this isn't (always) helpful when it comes to any scientific work as any 'entry bias' builds up a growing error margin.

Since we guys only have access to that video, we not even have a quality source for anything more than assuming 'I think that engine pod was damaged'.
I know, sort of boring outcome.  :P